Tuesday, January 20, 2009



D.C. cops ban pro-life messages

Is this the future of free speech and political dissent under President Obama?
"The Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department has forbidden a pro-life gathering and chalk display during Inauguration Week - and now the group is fighting back with a lawsuit against the District of Columbia.

Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition, said the department is banning the event because of its message. "For over 16 years, law enforcement officials have given permission to the Christian Defense Coalition to use public 'sidewalk chalking' as a part of their demonstrations and vigils in the nation's capitol. The City of Washington, D.C., has also allowed numerous public 'chalk art displays' throughout the city," he said in a statement. "It is therefore most troubling that for the first time the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department is banning this practice when it involves a pro-life display in front of the White House."

Thursday, Jan. 22, marks the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Since 1974, pro-life activists have gathered in Washington, D.C., each year to protest the decision and call attention to millions of lives lost. The Christian Defense Coalition and Generation Life and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust asked for permission to meet and draw sidewalk chalk messages on the sidewalk near the White House, as many groups have often done during public assemblies.

However, Commander James Crane denied their request in a Jan. 7 letter. He also said applying chalk to Pennsylvania Avenue and adjacent sidewalks "would constitute defacing public property in violation of D.C. Official Code 22-3312.01."

Source

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think chalking the sidewalks near the White House is defacing public property, but it's a law that must be applied to "all", not just Christians.

Anonymous said...

Anon #2 is an assmunch.

Anonymous said...

Anon #2 is an assmunch.

Anonymous said...

Anon #3 assmunch.

Anonymous said...

Anon #4 is an assmunch.

Anonymous said...

Pro-Lifers are Bullies! plain and simple.

It's their way or the highway. That illustrates a certain group of control-freaks with low-esteem.

They can't handle the idea they are not in 100% control.

I never heard of a pro-choice advocate threatening or even KILLING a doctor who refuses to do abortions because it's against his or her religious beliefs.

OK anon now label me if it sooths your dysfunctional ego.

Anonymous said...

I've never seen a pro-lifer kill a baby or unborn child because he didn't want it...

Anonymous said...

Hello Good Gentles All!

Glad to be back for a visit.

Hello Grainnewale!

"Pro-Lifers are Bullies! plain and simple. ... It's their way or the highway."

The entire US constitution, indeed all law, is an exercise in 'our way or the highway.'

Consider, as an example, the amendment forbidding slavery, would you prefer to allow some sort of state by state choice in this matter? If your answer is no, then how are you any different from anyone else regarding any other highly important moral philosophy? (If your answer is yes, then I will be highly interested to see your argument in court.)

Furthermore, the pro-abortion side is just as adamant as the anti-abortion side in this matter. I need merely cite FOCA as an example. This act will supercede all state law in favor of the federal statute which allows absolute unrestricted abortion. Abortion restrictions at the state level, even if enacted by popular vote, will be voided.

Your comment speaks about yourself as much as anyone else, so far as I can tell.


"I never heard of a pro-choice advocate threatening or even KILLING a doctor who refuses to do abortions because it's against his or her religious beliefs."

To confuse the actions of a few deranged persons with the underlying scientific, moral and social arguments of the group those misguided souls purport to support is absurd.


'OK anon now label me if it sooths your dysfunctional ego.'

Seems to me you have labled yourself without any help from Anon.

Pax,

InFides

Anonymous said...

Try the "pro-choice" approach if you're called for jury duty in a capital murder case:

Q: Prospective juror, are you in favor of the death penalty or against it?

A: I'm pro-choice on capital punishment. Not that I personally would kill or execute someone, but if you want to do that, that's your choice. I'm not like those rabid right-to-lifers who want to ban all executions. What are they, some kind of religious nuts?

Anonymous said...

And at the same time the tyrants in the DISTRICT of CRINIMALS allow hundreds of eco-freaks to invade and trash the place but if your prolife antiabortion then your not allowed to execise your 1st amendment rights TYPICAL OF TWO FACED LIBERALS

Anonymous said...

...a lawsuit against the District of Columbia.

Worked well for the NRA.