Thursday, September 27, 2012



Blinkered liberal Jew

Rachel Kahn-Troster (below) claims to be a rabbi, which shows how little regard she has for her own sacred scriptures.  Leviticus 6:14 says the priesthood shall consist of Aaron and his SONS.  But what's in that silly old Bible thingy doesn't matter to her, obviously.

So it is no wonder that she calls it "hate" when anybody draws attention to the constant violence and aggression in the Muslim world.  Closed eyes are clearly her specialty.  She says not a word about America's recently slaughtered Ambassador in Libya, for instance.  She has no integrity at all.


My daily trek to work is the last place I would expect to encounter a hateful message. But anti-Islam blogger Pamela Geller is determined to make that happen to me and my fellow commuters.
This week, at 10 subway stations around New York, commuters will encounter ads from the virulently anti-Islam group headed by Geller, the American Freedom Defense Initiative. Geller has been cited both by the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center for her anti-Muslim activity.  [It's A badge of honor to be cited by such far-Left outfits]

The subway ads say, "In Any War Between the Civilized Man and the Savage, Support the Civilized Man." Below that are the words: "Support Israel. Defeat Jihad," with a Star of David on either side of the phrases. The coded message makes clear who the savages are: those who support jihad, which in Geller's mind includes all Muslims. She has called Islam "an extreme ideology, the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the Earth."

At first, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority rejected the ads, but a district judge ruled the ads were protected under the First Amendment. The ads follow similar ads in San Francisco as well as posters at New York's Metro North train stations

The Metro North ads denied their bigotry by stating, "It's not Islamophobia. It's Islamorealism," claiming the actions of a few represented the "reality" of Islam. But when did it become acceptable to spread bigotry against any American religious, racial or ethnic group in the name of "realism"?

Source

I gather that Rachel Can't Trust Her has some small theological background so at the risk of re-plowing an already very furrowed field I will mention an objection that she and her ilk might have to the modern-day applicability of Leviticus Chapter 6.  It is a chapter primarily concerned with burnt offerings and such things.  And NOBODY does burnt offerings these days, though some barbecue cooks might be suspected of it.

The point is however that the Jerusalem temple later became the  sole locus of such offerings and the destruction of the temple  by the Romans FORCED the abandonment of burnt offerings.  But there is nothing to force the abandonment of a solely male religious leadership.

I suppose I am making an argument about Halakha above  -- which is pretty mad for a non-Jew -- but I think I can read my Bible as well as anyone.  I guess my Protestant background is showing.

15 comments:

Bird of Pairadice said...

"But what's in that silly old Bible thingy doesn't matter to her, obviously."

Doesn't matter to me, either. The bible belongs in the Fantasy section of the bookstore.

Use the Name, Luke said...

Pamela Geller recently wrote an opinion piece related to those ads.

I'm Offending ‘Savages’? Guilty as Charged

Our ad said: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Defeat jihad. Support Israel.” We submitted this ad to run on New York subway platforms and in Washington, D.C., Metro train dioramas. The contracts were signed and the ads were paid for up front. They were scheduled to run this week, and that was particularly apt; in light of the cold-blooded murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens, as well as that of two former Navy SEALs and another American in Libya, what else would you call jihadists but “savages”? Why is this controversial? The ads should be papered across America.

Anonymous said...

When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movement becomes headlong – faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thought of obstacles and forget that a precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it’s too late.
--Bene Gesserit proverb

Presidnet Not Sure said...

"And NOBODY does burnt offerings these days, though some barbecue cooks might be suspected of it."

Mmmmmm.. Burnt ends..

http://www.seriouseats.com/2010/08/what-are-burnt-ends-brisket-barbecue.html

Sorry I coulndt help it..

Malcolm Smith said...

I have to point out, however, Ray, that a rabbi is not a priest. A priest is (was)one of the lineage of Aaron, who were involved in temple activities. A rabbi is a Pharisee ie one of those who sets himself apart for the study of the Law and the leadership of the synagogue. It was a position which developed in the 2nd century BC, and is not mentioned in the Hebrew scriptures. But whether a woman can be a rabbi is something you would have to consult a Jew about.

Anonymous said...

She is a judenratt. Betrays the Jewish people, she should get in bed with bloomberg 2 judenratts.

Anonymous said...

A response to Ms Kahn-Troster
1. The message was not 'coded'. It was quite overt in its meaning - Jihadis do not deserve support. It does not say anything about moderate Muslims or anyone else. It is simple = backward thinking does not deserve support. Freedom and democracy deserve support. Do you want westerners to support Jihadis? Good luck with that.
2. Whether it is 'acceptable' or not to spread 'bigotry' is neither here nor there. It is an expression protected by the First Amendment. That is not something you will find in the Islamic world where you, madam, would be persecuted for your religion, reviled for your gender and possibly killed for your opinions.
3. I await your column decrying the advertisements for the Boradway Musical 'The Book of Mormon' and your lengthy condemnation of its mockery and persecution of Mormons.

Bird of Paradise said...

ORIGION OF THE SPECIES belong in the junk science section

Anonymous said...

11:24,

You really should remember to take your meds.

Anonymous said...

As Bird cannot spell, he/she/it may have a problem finding the "junk science section" or any other section. I also doubt h/s/i knows much about any science, but probably knows a lot of junk.

Anonymous said...

Sugar coat it all you want, but at its core, Islam is very hostile and violent against non-Muslims. It has no tolerance for criticism of itself, yet is quick to criticize others. It demands respect of itself yet shows no respect to non-Muslims. It supports those how follow Islam, yet encourages violence against those who do not.

Anonymous said...

WTFU

Cheesehead said...

"Someone does not have to be a son of Aaron (i.e., a Levitical Priest) to be a Rabbi."

Aaron Rogers, quarterback for the Green Bay Packers? He doesn't look Jewish.

Anonymous said...

I am voting for Romney; he will nuke the mideast.

Anonymous said...

Jews never complain about bacon, why are muslims so fanatical about it? I'm going to wipe my hand in bacon grease tomorrow right before shaking the hands of some Muslims I'm meeting for the first time.